原文網址:
http://www.infoworld.com/article/08/06/30/Firefox_30_wins_memory_battle_1.html

獨立測試者說Mozilla的瀏覽器比IE、Opera, Flock, and Safari在Windows平台更加高效率地使用記憶體
Independent tester says Mozilla's browser uses memory much more efficiently than rivals IE, Opera, Flock, and Safari on Windows
以下是部份原文與google翻譯(有點慘不忍睹, 但還是提供大家參考)

Mozilla's Firefox 3.0 browser uses memory much more efficiently than its rivals, according to an independent tester who wrote a memory-monitoring utility to track usage by Firefox, Internet Explorer (IE), Flock, Opera and Safari.
Mozilla的Firefox 3.0瀏覽器使用記憶體更有效地比其競爭對手，根據一個獨立的測試誰寫的內存監測工具來追踪使用的Firefox時， Internet Explorer （ IE ）中，羊群，歌劇和Safari 。

In a lengthy post to his Web site, .Net developer Sam Allen spelled out the data he collected from the "Memory Watcher" application he wrote specifically to track Web browser memory use.
在冗長的員額，以在自己的網站， 。 NET開發薩姆李鵬飛列出的數據，他收集到的“記憶觀察家”的應用，他寫道，專門跟踪Web瀏覽器內存使用。

Although Allen acknowledged that the testing was unscientific -- he ran each browser between 2.69 hours and 2.91 hours, for instance, and didn't claim to have visited the exact same pages with each -- he claimed that the trend lines drawn by Memory Watcher were valid.
雖然艾倫承認，測試是不科學的-他然每個瀏覽器之間的2 .69小時和二點九一小時，舉例來說，並沒有聲稱已經訪問了完全相同的頁面與每個-他聲稱，這一趨勢線，所得出的記憶觀察家有效的。

The results, he said, "Are not a direct comparison in any way, but they offer a visualization of trending in the memory behavior of the layout engines and interfaces."
結果，他說： “是不是一個直接比較，以任何方式，但他們提供一個可視化的趨勢，在記憶體行為的佈局，引擎和接口” 。

Firefox 3.0 was the clear winner, not only because it used the least amount of memory of any of the tested browsers, but its memory use didn't noticeably grow over time.
Firefox的3.0是明顯的贏家，這不僅是因為它用最少的記憶體數量的任何測試的瀏覽器，但其內存使用量並沒有明顯成長，隨著時間的推移。

"This browser exhibits memory usage that is by far lower than the others," Allen said of Firefox 3.0.
“此瀏覽器展品記憶體使用量是遠遠低於其他國家， ”艾倫說的Firefox 3.0 。

"It releases memory to the system and the trend line is nearly flat."
“新聞稿記憶體，以制度和趨勢線是近持平” 。